
When companies talk about sustainability, the conversation often jumps straight to big-ticket initiatives — energy usage, fleet electrification, or facility upgrades. Those efforts matter, but they aren’t the whole story. In reality, some of the most measurable and attainable ESG wins come from the small, everyday supplies used across operations.
Wiping products are a perfect example. Purchased in bulk, used daily, and disposed of constantly, rags and wipers quietly influence waste generation, carbon footprint, and resource consumption. At Wipeco, sustainability isn’t a marketing trend — it’s a core value. The company’s owner is deeply passionate about environmental responsibility, and that commitment shows in how reclaimed textiles and responsible wiping solutions are sourced and supplied.
This article explores how thoughtful choices around wiping products can deliver outsized ESG impact — without disrupting operations or increasing costs.
Wiping products are high-volume supplies with significant ESG influence.
Reclaimed and reusable rags reduce landfill waste and carbon impact.
Smart product selection supports environmental goals without sacrificing performance.
Procurement teams can document real ESG progress through cleaning supplies.
Wipeco’s sustainability-driven sourcing aligns operational needs with environmental responsibility.
Environmental, Social, and Governance initiatives succeed when they’re practical and repeatable. While capital projects move the needle over time, everyday operational choices determine consistency.
Cleaning supplies touch nearly every ESG category:
Environmental: Waste generation, raw material use, transportation emissions
Social: Safer, cleaner work environments
Governance: Responsible sourcing, supplier transparency, and reporting
Because wiping products are used so frequently, even small improvements — switching materials, reducing disposables, or standardizing reuse — create measurable results.
Most facilities underestimate how much waste comes from wiping materials alone. Disposable wipes, paper towels, and low-quality single-use products quickly add up — both in landfill volume and procurement costs.
Single-use disposal after light-duty tasks
Excess packaging from frequent reorders
Transportation emissions from repeated deliveries
Virgin fiber production for disposable products
By contrast, reusable and reclaimed wiping rags significantly reduce these impacts.
Reclaimed wiping rags extend the life of existing textiles that would otherwise enter the waste stream. Cotton t-shirts, denim, flannel, and sweatshirt materials are repurposed into durable industrial wiping solutions.
ESG advantages of reclaimed rags:
Diverts textiles from landfills
Reduces demand for virgin cotton production
Lowers energy and water usage
Decreases carbon emissions associated with manufacturing
At Wipeco, reclaimed textiles aren’t a niche offering — they’re foundational to the business. This long-standing commitment reflects leadership that values environmental responsibility alongside performance and cost efficiency.
Disposable wipers serve an important role in sanitation-critical and chemical-sensitive applications. But when used by default, they inflate waste and cost with little added value.
A mixed-use system delivers the best ESG outcomes:
Reusable cotton or reclaimed rags for daily cleaning, oil absorption, and maintenance
Targeted disposables for food contact, hazardous chemicals, or precision wiping
This approach reduces waste without compromising hygiene or safety — a balance ESG-focused organizations increasingly expect.
ESG reporting often focuses on energy and fuel — but supply chain emissions matter too. Bulk reusable rags reduce:
Manufacturing emissions from disposable products
Transportation emissions from frequent deliveries
Packaging waste associated with small-case purchasing
By buying wiping rags in bulk and choosing longer-life materials, companies can lower Scope 3 emissions in a tangible, defensible way.
Procurement teams are uniquely positioned to influence ESG outcomes. Cleaning supplies are:
Easy to track
Simple to standardize
Quick to change
Highly visible in reporting
Switching to reclaimed or reusable wiping products allows procurement to demonstrate environmental progress without requiring operational disruption or capital expense.
ESG-friendly procurement signals include:
Supplier transparency
Recycled or reclaimed material sourcing
Reduced single-use product reliance
Waste reduction initiatives
Wipeco’s sourcing model supports all of these — making ESG-aligned purchasing straightforward.
Environmental responsibility goes hand-in-hand with workplace safety. Reliable wiping products help:
Reduce slip hazards
Control chemical exposure
Maintain cleaner equipment
Improve employee morale and pride
A facility that invests in appropriate cleaning supplies sends a clear message: safety and responsibility matter.
ESG programs require repeatability and documentation. Wiping products lend themselves well to both. Usage data, supplier certifications, and purchasing records create a paper trail that supports audits and reporting.
Partnering with a consistent supplier like Wipeco simplifies governance by ensuring predictable quality, availability, and sourcing practices.
Switching wiping products doesn’t require retraining staff, reengineering processes, or disrupting workflows. Yet the impact shows up quickly:
Less waste in dumpsters
Lower monthly supply spend
Cleaner facilities
Stronger ESG metrics
That’s the power of focusing on the everyday.
1. Can wiping products really impact ESG metrics?
Yes. Their volume and disposal frequency make them a measurable sustainability lever.
2. Are reclaimed rags as effective as new products?
Absolutely. Reclaimed cotton delivers excellent absorbency and durability.
3. Do reusable rags compromise hygiene?
Not when used appropriately and paired with disposables where required.
4. How can procurement document ESG improvements?
By tracking reductions in disposable usage and increases in reclaimed materials.
5. Is switching to sustainable wiping products expensive?
No — in most cases, it lowers total cost of ownership.